Math 300 , Spring 2008, Day 5, Wed, Feb 6 fixed refs 7pm2/5 Hit reload to get most current version..

Read: Ash 1-4, pp 20-27  (postpone P(AorBorC) pp21ff. on first reading, then return)
Math 251 did a little of this:  M&M 5th ed: pp259-266 (not Independence), 311-315 for and, or 
HW: on 1.4
A)  Show DeMorgan's laws true by shading a series of Venn diagrams.
From Moore&McCabe: 5th ed: p. 323, 4.86,4.88   (3 sets 4.92, 3, 4 ) Solutions to odd#s are in back of the book, Sol's in the Math Clinic (I hope).  
Ash, p.27:  3, 4, 5, 2, 8, 9, 11 a&b.   (Don't feel bad if you have to look at the answers.)
B:  Show nC1- nC2 + nC3 - nC4+..-...+nCn = 1 when n = 5.  (Write out the formulas and Look!  Even n's are harder.)
 
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

I didn't demo the Siegrist virtual laboratories http://www.math.uah.edu/stat/) (direct to applets)  Ball and Urn = Hypergeometric.
Other HW questions?

"New" material: Sets--OR (union), AND (intersection), NOT (complement), and probabilities thereof

(Relative) Area is a good metaphor for probability.  Venn Diagrams help with counting too.
how to shade venn diagrams,    2-set probabilities,(same)  3-set probabilities    diagrams for more than 3 sets (math research)

Probability RULES:  S is sample space, A event.  (M&M numbering)
1)  0< P(A) < 1,  any A in S
2)  P(S) = 1
3)  P(Ac) = 1- P(A)      (Therefore P(empty set, impossible event) = 0)
4)  If A and B are disjoint ("Mutually exclusive")  ((A and B) is empty), then P(Aor B) = P(A) + P(B)
4b) P(AorB) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B)     (4 is a special case of 4 b, but more "basic")
?    P (A and Not B) = P(A) - P(A and B).   fig 4.18(ed.4))

Remember OR is always "inclusive"--"and/or" in math, tho not in English.
   Exclusive or (XOR) sometimes  "happens" when A and B are defined in a problem; can use rule 4.
Warning:  Mutually Exclusive = Disjoint.  Doesn't = Independent (which we haven't met yet this semester)

- - - - - - -
Some Useful set rules
:  (Ash's examples, p. 27)

"At least 3"   List numbers and circle your set, (red bolded here)
0 1 2  3 4 5 6...  See what's left if you want the complement.  Why think if you can draw?
     Visible (same) at least (at most, etc.) in context of Binomial
"At least one" has complement "none"

DeMorgan's Laws:
   (A or B)c = Ac and Bc       Not( Aor B) = Not A And Not B.
              I don't want cake or pie = I don't want cake and I don't want pie.
  (A and B)c = Ac or  Bc        Not (A and B) = Not A Or Not B:
             You can't have cake and pie = You can't have cake, or you can't have pie.

Distributive:  A and (B or C) = (A or B) and (A or C)
                     A or (B and C) = (A and B) or (A and C)  (not in texts but sometimes useful)

3 or more sets:  Look at 3 sets:  P(AorBorC) = 
    P(A) + P(B)
+ P(C)
          - P(A and B)
- P(A and C) - P(B and C)    (areas added twice above)
               +
P(A and B and C)  (area added 3 times and subtracted 3 times above) Ash p. 21 (2)
Principle of inclusion and exclusion (p. 21): P( A or B or C.....):  Subtract P's of intersections of all even-set intersections, add P's of intersections of all odd-set intersections.
This formula also works if you are counting elements in sets.  Just change  P to #, so #(A) is the number of elements in A.  (Numerator for equally likely sample space.)
There's some nice math here:
Suppose you are looking at a Discrete sample space, so individual points have probability.  Consider a point x.
Look at  two sets A and B.   #(A or B)= #(A) + #(B) - #(A&B)
    Suppose x is only in one of the sets (say A).  Then it's counted once.
    Suppose x is in two of the sets.  Then it's counted twice (the simple sets) and de-counted once (the pair).

Suppose you have a whole bunch of sets, A, B, C, D, E,.... and you look at the union #(A or B or C or....).  The general pattern holds: 1-at-a-time-terms - 2-at-a-time-terms + 3-at-a-time-terms....  Here's the beginning of a general proof.
   Suppose x is in one of the sets (A).  It's counted 1 time.
    Suppose x is in two of the sets (A, B).  How often is it counted?
                2C1 = # of single sets it's in.  Minus 2C2 = # of 2-set intersections it's in.  = 2-1=1
    Suppose x is in three of the sets (A, B, C).  How often is it counted?
                3C1 = # of single sets it's in.  Minus 3C2 = # of 2-set intersections it's in.
                        Plus 3C3= # of 3-set intersections it's in = 3 -3 + 1=1
    Suppose x is in four of the sets.  How often is it counted?  4C1 - 4C2 + 4C3 - 4C4 = 4 - 6 + 4 - 1 = 1
Etc.  So whatever point you pick, it gets counted the correct number of times.
Not proved yet: the needed general fact,    nC1-nC2+nC3-nC4+..-...+nCn = 1
We'll prove this later on, using a different approach.



Sievers home  Math300-Sp08/Day8p5.htm  7pm 2/5/08
This page belongs to Sally Sievers who is solely responsible for its content. Please see our statement of responsibility.