Math 151 , Spring 2006, Day 32 Wednesday, April 19 Hit reload

Exam 3, a week from Friday (Day 36)  Covers Part III, experiments (one-factor), diagrams, several designs.  (Day 23HW on).  Part IV (what we did), and V thru Monday Day 34
Day 32(Wednesday, April 20): Reading: Finish Ch. 19. Next: Chapter 20+21 thru p. 392 (Activstats is good here too.)  Then continue (Alpha levels) through p.397.  Lightly through Power . Read What can go wrong p. 401 and the rest. (SPSS won't do proportion computations, but some other programs do; it's good to have an idea what you might see, p. 402.)
Hand in (All D&V)
Ch. 19p. 366 ff
3, 4 Conditions
16 Local news
ME, C, n pp. 356-7, 361-3.  Problems p. 368
7, 8  Relationships
23 Deer ticks
25 Graduation  The answers in the back use the 25% as the p to plug in.  Redo part a (only) using 50% as the p (what you would do if you had no idea what p would be.). How many subjects do you "save" by using the 25%? 
26 Hiring
28 Hiring again
29  Pilot study
Read,
  to 
discuss 
Op
tion
 al 
Do-overs for Exam 2 are due today.
If you haven't: You found the 68% and 95% CI's for your sample., Please add your results to our list:  (with your initials)
# of 1's, p-hat, SE(p-hat), p-hat + SE, ME for 95% = 1.96SE, p-hat + 1.96SE
Also draw your 68% CI on the graph circulating    |------o------|

Homework questions? Day 31
Level C confidence interval estimate of population proportion p:
 "One -proportion  z-interval"


z* critical values:  common ones are in table T  Day 31
Assumptions and conditions to use the CI formula:
   Sample "like SRS"--independence, no bias visible.  n < 10% of pop.  P-hat normalish: np and nq > 10, using p-hat for p. 
Day 31
Sample size for desired ME and C Day 31
Why this ME "works". Day 31


We're doing "confirmatory" analysis here:  We've explored, developed ideas, things we want to measure and ways to measure them. 
--Estimating parameter value using statistic from sample:  Confidence interval estimates.  Other big category:
Tests:  (Chapter 20, for proportions) You have a hypothesis about the world. And you collect some data.
Does the data lend support to the hypothesis, or is the data inconsistent with the hypothesis?
      (Retain / fail to reject the hypothesis)                       (Reject the hypothesis)
Easier to reject a hypothesis than to show that it's true.

Lots of machinery and vocabulary:
NULL Hypothesis Ho : (Straw man we collect evidence against.  No change from Status quo. )
Assume Ho is true.  Look at evidence (data).  Is it inconsistent with Ho ? Then Reject Ho .
  (How inconsistent with Ho is the data?  a little, somewhat, very?  how do we measure it?  Turn into numbers---)

Ho : a specific model for the population, with a specific parameter value.
Example (suppose I hadn't told you...):  Green shoebox is full of 0's and1's.  I tell you Equal numbers.
Ho : p = .5 (proportion of 1's is 50%)  po for a general label.
    Is your  sample (n = 30) far enough away from .5 to say that I'm lying? Suppose you believe I undersupplied 1's:

HA : p < .5  (one-sided alternative hypothesis:  What you hope /fear /would like to prove)
How do we measure "far enough away?"
IF Ho  is true: how far out (weird) is your p-hat?
IF  p = .5, how far from  the "real" p is your p-hat?  po = .5
                 Distribution of p-hats is approx.  N(), N( .5, sqrt(.5 ·.5/30)),  N( .5, .091)  (Usual assumptions.)
    Suppose you got 12 1's.  p-hat = .4. IF  p = .5, p-hat = .4 has a z-score of -.1/.091 = - 1.095 ~ -1.10 Sketch the Normal.
        If you know your z-scores, this is meaningful.  A more universal measure is the
P-value:  The probability, assuming Ho  is true, of observing the result we have (or one more extreme)--if we could do the experiment again...  Strength of evidence against Ho(thus for HA)
   In our example: The probability of getting a p-hat of .4 or below, IF p = .5. Sketch on the curve.
                   The "tail" below z = -1.10.  From normal table, .1357 ~ 13.6%.  So
    P-value = .136.  Not so unusual; happens more than 1 in ten times (13-14 in a hundred).  Suggestive but not "significant" by most people's standards.

Read the text.  Read it again..... Do ActivStats...Read it again...


Sievers home  Math151-Sp06/Daysp32.htm  3pm 4/17/06
This page belongs to Sally Sievers who is solely responsible for its content. Please see our statement of responsibility.