Math 151 , Fall 2008 Monday Day 25, Oct. 27 Hit reload...after class.

HW:   Read Data Ethics, pp. 235-242 if you haven't. Read Ch. 10 to p. 256, (exam to here.)then def. of Random Variable (discrete) p. 260. Check p. 263ff. 10.19, 20, then , 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27.  .exam to here. Ahead,  Read rest (Note Normal distribution is back) . Check 10.21, 28

Hand in  Wednesday .  Bring  sample exam questions, other questions.

Hand in Wednesday, Day 26:  "Ethics": Read Data Ethics, pp 235-242.  Find at least one other person in the class, and together discuss  one of these questions.  Write up your answers as a pair/trio  (If you have consensus, fine! If you disagree, say who thinks what).  pp. 242-245, # 4 or 5 or 9 or 11 or 13 or 14 or 17

= = = = = Probability , Ch. 10. Problems rearranged slightly
p. 265, 10.30 Sample spaces, free throws
p. 252, 10.5 Sample spaces
 p. 249, 10.3 50, 200 Random digits.  Bring your result for part (b) to class to compare with others.  I did it 4 times (four sets of 200 tosses) , got .06, .09, .07, .14!   Applet:  Probability

p. 250, 10.4 Probability says..
p. 254, 10.9 Canadian languages
p. 254, 10.12 Watching TV, (RV but doesn't say so explicitly, so you can do it.)
p. 266, 10.37 Land in Canada

p. 265, 10.31 Probability models?  Note, you are only checking whether the model is legitimate, not whether it's correct for the phenomenon described!

p. 267,
10.42 Race and ethnicity

 p. 256, 10.10 rolling die.  Which obey the probability rules?
p. 268, 10.44 Benford One more discrete probability

.Exam to here. Postpone these last 2 problems.
p. 261, 10.16 Grades RV
p. 252, 10.6 and 10.7 D&D, 4-sided dice

Read, to discuss


Optional 

Exam this Friday Oct 31 (Day 27). Sign up today, as usual.   Bring one sheet of notes.  Chapters 8 and 9 all, Some  of Ch 10 --through HW assigned today. All but 7d are "on" the exam.
   Sample exam available today in class, or in white folder outside my door.  Solutions Here.
Note that there is no problem on the sample involving two (or more)" factors" or expressly listing "factors" and "treatments", but such questions could be on the exam. 
I have been known to ask questions on the exam specifically on the "outside" reading, such as the Placebo Effect articles; Bradley effect.
Review Normal distribution: we'll want it soon after the exam. 

Homework questions, Fancier designs (not completely randomized):  Day 24
Placebo Effect?
Any questions yet for exam?

Finishing Design of Experiments:  Prospective/Retrospective Day 24


Chapter 10, Probability (intro) Details Day 24 
Bare Bones:  Chance  behavior (a random phenomenon): Unpredictable in the short run,  predictable regular pattern in the long run.   "Probability" of particular something happening: proportion of times it would happen in a very long series of (independent) repetitions of the phenomenon.   Applet:  Probability

Probability Models : (p. 250-256)
   Random phenomenon,
described by
    Sample space S: 
set of all possible outcomes (no overlap of descriptions)

    Event:  any outcome or set of outcomes
    Probability model: S, and a way of assigning a probability to each event.
Sample space depends on what you want to know:
Phenomenon: Flip coin twice.
    S1 = {HH, HT, TH, TT}     S2 = {0, 1, 2} number of heads   S3 = {Y, N} both are heads?
  ..
We looked at the probabilities for these, implicitly using the "common sense" rules for proportions just below.

Probability rules:  pp. 253, in words, then in notation.
A an event in sample space S, P(A) is "the probability that  A occurs"
    These rules are all true for proportions in long run (Probabilities), proportion of counts, proportions of areas.
    1.  0 < P(A) < 1   (any probability is a number between 0 and 1. )
    2. P(S) = 1         (all the outcomes together have total probability 1)
    3.  A and B are  disjoint if they have no outcomes in common (can't happen simultaneously.)
        If A and B are disjoint, their probabilities add:  P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B)
   
4. For any event A, P(A does not occur) = 1 - P(A)

Discrete models: Assign a probability to each outcome (>0) so they add to 1.  Prob. of an event is sum of prob's of its outcomes.
  .Start here next time. "Random variable" language not on the exam..
Random Variable:  (X, Y, Z...) Variable whose value is a numerical outcome of a random phenomenon.
 Probability distribution of X tells us what values X can take and how to assign probabilities to them.
    If X has a finite number of possible values (Discrete distributions), nothing new except notation.
     P(X < 2) is "Prob. that X is less than 2."
New/recap:
Probabilities follow the "common sense" rule for proportions of a whole.  Same rules for proportions of areas, proportions of counts, proportions in histograms, proportions of times in the long run something would happen. 
Two principles for assigning probabilities:
--Sometimes, a properly chosen sample space will have equally likely outcomes. You can use this to find other probabilities.
--If you pick an individual at random from a population, the probability that one individual will be XYZ is the same as the proportion of XYZ's in the population.

A probability example:
Recall exercise 8.10: 
Pick 6 people from list of 28 managers.  How many people of East Asian surname do you get?  Excel analysis with this year's data. Last year
X = number of people of East Asian surname
, in a sample of size 6 from a list of 28, where 5 of the 28 have East Asian surnames.

Sample space :     X 
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Probability (from theory)
.268
.447
.235
.047
.003
.000
0: impossible
Proportion out of  37 usable HW's
.243
.351
.324
.027
.054
.000

Spring '08 --significantly different?
(n = 11)
.727 (8)
.182 (2)
.091 (1)




(You won't learn how to calculate these probabilities.  Ch. 13, which we'll skip, gives a hint. )  chisq = 17.6
The chance of our seeing another 11 random samples that are this far "off" from the theoretical proportions, if they really were random samples, is less than 1 in a thousand.  This would be "statistically significant" evidence that some of the 11 people dry-labbed it--but since I wasn't doing an experiment deliberately to check on that,  I have to keep in mind that maybe this just was that 1-in-a-thousand event. 
Mythbusters episode 50, poison oak vs. vodka.  It took 6 tries to find a person not immune to poison oak, though only 10 % of the population is immune.  Chances of that are .00001, 1 in 10,000.  Unusual things DO HAPPEN.  On the other hand, people may react only on 2nd or 3rd exposure, so "10% immune" may be wrong for never exposed population.
(Lurking variables for Manager sample, Sp08: I didn't warn people I'd be asking for it; I asked for them to be written on clipboard in class, I didn't check actual HW papers. Previous terms (& this) I took numbers from HW papers.)

Next:   Continuous Sample Spaces.


Sievers home   Math151-F08/Dayf25.htm  11am 10/27/08
This page belongs to Sally Sievers who is solely responsible for its content. Please see our statement of responsibility.