|
Hand in: p. 338, 5.74 common names (What are your chances if you're taking a statistics course? Lower...) .Postpone the rest Sec. 6.1, confidence intervals, p.
357ff., mostly. using formula: ( ConfidenceInterval.xls Excel spreadsheet automates it-to check answers.) 6.11, 6.12 changes of m with n and C Cautions (pp. 354-5) |
Read,
discuss .Postpone the rest.. 6.27 Job satisfaction, Gallup, margin of error |
Optional 6.17, 18 biomarkers |
Quiz (Probably Wednesday (not before)): Knowing and using:
Mean and st. dev. for X-bar from SRS of size n (Summary p. 308)
Normal? Central limit theorem: says
yes for all parent distributions, approximately, for n large.
If population(s) normal to start with, linear
combinations stay normal (including X-bar), mean and
s.d. follow algebra rules
(as last quiz.) Binomial
distribution formula (p. 329 bottom)
mean and st. dev. for Binomial: X (count),
p-hat (proportion) (Summary p.332)
Homework questions? Day 29
General issue from Central Limit Th. (don't remember saying this...) What if the population is not 10 to 20 times the sample size? The real s.d. of the x-bars will be narrower than the sigma over square root of n formula. You may not "get to" normal as a shape. Sample of 4 grades from a population of 10 All possible samples. ...
Binomial: Tell me mean & s.d.
of X, p-hat.
Some sample p-hats; (n = 25, p =
.6, .2) Compare with your graphs of distributions.
Growth of binomial X as n increases: Mean grows
like n, but spread grows like sqrt(n).
Sample Proportion as n increases: Mean stays
at p, but spread shrinks like 1/sqrt(n).
Applet "Normal approximation to Binomial", Excel graph of Binomial
Binomial: formula,
Did a bunch of HW Friday, only new material was
Binomial formula.
Monday,
Normal approximation Day 29
Ch. 6: Introduction
to Statistical Inference:
Requires: Random sample
or Randomized experiment. (Our theory: Simple Random
Sample usually)
First example: Use sample mean
xbar to "estimate" (unknown)
population mean µ
Mean of 4 grades estimates
population mean of all 10 ("known"= 69.4) Population dist, Dist. of all sample means.
Some samples
E.g. 69.75,
64.25, 73.5 (Each
is a "point estimate")
Interval estimate: xbar + margin of error (fudge factor) estimates population mean µ (69.4)
69.75 + 1: "µ is
between 65.75 and 73.75" True
69.75 + 4: "µ is
between 65.75 and 73.75" True
73.5 + 4:
"µ is between 69.5 and 77.5" False
73.5 + 5:
"µ is between 68.5 and 78.5" True
64.25 + 4:
"µ is between 60.25 and 68.25" False
64.25 + 5:
"µ is between 59.25 and 69.25" False
A level C Confidence interval estimate of a(n unknown) population
parameter: (p. 347)
Birkenstock Shoebox: You're
constructing a
Confidence Interval of the form estimate +
margin-of-error for the mean µ with Confidence
level C: (p.346) Does yours capture the real
shoebox mean?
Applet: Confidence Interval. Many sample means: shows it's not the individual interval that C describes, but the Method.
(Table A, or Table D (back flyleaf), t dist.
bottom row)
Got to here Monday
The Birkenstock box contains numbers from a
normally distributed population, with population standard deviation 2.
You each constructed a 60% confidence interval for the unknown mean:
(proof:)
n = 4.
Standard deviation of sample mean = 2/sqrt(4) = 2/2
= 1
z* for C = 60% is .841, so margin of error m is .841
times 1= .841.
To get the z* for C = 60% from the normal table, note
that this is the middle 60%, which leaves 40% to be split
between the 2 tails. So 20% above z*, and 80%
below. Go into the body of table A, find 80%= .8000 is between
values .7995 and .8023, closer to .7995. The z value with .7995
below it is .84. Table D gives it more precisely as .841.
How many people captured the true mean?
Previous classes,11/20 = 55% , 22/29=
76%. 9/18 = 50% , 11/20 = 55%, 15/22= 68%,
16/24 = 67%, 16/18 = 89%, 7/13 =
54%, 8/16 = 50%, 7/14 = 50%, 5/10 = 50%, 11/14=79%,. 8/17 = 47%, 10/16
= 63%, 12/19 = 63%. Combined 168/270 =
62.2%. This year's
classes, (now) 24/31 = 77%, Combined 192/301 = 63.8%
Quite variable for small samples, but settling
down?)
Graphed results, (151 combined with 251): Fall '07 CI's
Sp. '08 CI's. Fall'08 CI's. Sp.
'09 CI's. Sp.
'10 CI's.Compare
with Applet:
Confidence intervals. This year's
shows more uniformity (some who were "out" didn't graph!)
Extension: If n is large, we can
use the formula even if population is not normal.
(Because only the distribution of Xbar is
used, and Xbar is normal! Central Limit Theorem)
Cautions read pp. 354-5
| Sievers home | Math251-Fall11/Dayq30.htm | 10pm | 11/8/11 |