March 25, 2002
The
Subcommittee on Strategic and Long-range Planning has had extensive discussion
about options for Zabriskie Hall in anticipation of the Natural and Mathematical
Sciences Division's move to the Science Building after its completion. The committee has considered information
from a variety of sources. Most
recently, the Subcommittee reviewed the results of a feasibility study for
Zabriskie Hall, which was conducted by HOLT Architects, which relied on
information gathered during charrettes conducted with each of the divisions
from 2000-2001. The charrette data
serve as the basis for the development of an "Ideal Program Proposed
Space" and was not reviewed by the Subcommittee. After extensive discussion of the findings of the feasibility
study, the Subcommittee concluded that the architect’s "Test Results"
in all of the following five scenarios ("Adaptation Ideas") for
Zabriskie are fair compromises between current program needs and anticipated
program growth.
As
indicated in the architect's statement below, all scenarios will require much
more charrette-style discussions with the disciplines involved and continued
interaction between all affected parties, if any of the Adaptation Ideas are to
become realistic and implementable plans.
HOLT statement excerpts:
This
study was conducted to determine the feasibility of accommodating the Zabriskie
Academic Adaptation Ideas generated at the APPC - SPC meeting of December 14,
2001. The findings of this feasibility
study should not be viewed as solutions but, rather, as a study to determine
the rough overall compatibility of each Adaptation Idea and the existing
building. "Once a program match
for the building is agreed to, detailed space programming and design will need
to be undertaken to determine whether the proposed solution is truly
feasible. There are many possible ways of organizing the spaces, and these have
not been fully explored as part of this study. Additionally, should
decisions about space compromises need to be made, detailed input from the
users of the space and the College Administration will be necessary."
All of
the scenarios assume: A) no major addition of useable space to Zabriskie and B)
a new elevator and second exit stair would be provided for outside of the
existing building envelope. If it is determined that they need to be
accommodated within the envelope of the existing structure, less useable space
will be available than is currently assumed.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
NSF – Net Square Feet
– a measure of the utilizable space, obtained in this study by dividing the
gross square feet of a space by 1.8.
Existing Space – the area currently used
by a program for faculty offices, classrooms, labs, etc. Does not include shared or public spaces,
e.g., lobbies, restrooms, or administrative space.
Ideal Program Proposed Space – the area that a program
would have if its ideals were realized.
These numbers emerged from charrette processes (except for Math/CS, with
whom there have been brief telephone consultations) and have not been reviewed
by the APPC or the subcommittee.
Test Results – the area that would be
devoted to a program, based on the architect’s preliminary attempt to adapt
Zabriskie, as evidenced by the building plans.
THEATRE/DANCE & MUSIC ADAPTATION IDEA
Strengths
1.
Program
recital hall is roughly equivalent to Barler Auditorium (1680 NSF).
2.
Adjacencies
would be strengthened, improving proximity to other Theater spaces in Macmillan
and between all performing arts.
Weaknesses
1.
Dance
Studio/Theatre and Black Box Theatre share a single space and support
facilities accommodated and are compromised in size.
2.
All
share a single rehearsal space; only one dressing room accommodated.
3.
4 of 6 music practice rooms (80-120 NSF each)
accommodated.
4.
3
of 4 current Music faculty/staff office spaces (200 NSF each) accommodated.
5.
Listening
Library is not accommodated.
Comments
Significant
compromises have been made in converting the ideal program in Theater/Dance to
the test results. However, there might
be ways in which further work in balancing programmatic needs could be done, to
flesh out this proposal. Noise and
facility-overlap are concerns.
Major/Program Existing Space /
Ideal Program Proposed Space / Test Results
Theatre
& Dance 4,290 NSF 18,010 NSF 8,160 NSF
(Note: Does not include Proscenium Theatre & supporting spaces in Macmillan)
Music 5,500 NSF
7,900 NSF 5,890
NSF
STUDIO ARTS ADAPTATION IDEA
Strengths
1.
Strong
allowance for program growth in terms of square footage.
Weaknesses
1.
Ceramics
Storage (430 NSF) and Raku Kilns not accommodated.
2.
4
of 8 ideal program faculty offices/studios accommodated in test results
3.
No
general classroom or seminar space in test result but there may be ways to
accommodate.
4.
Requires
extensive work for an air filtration system to handle dust and fumes.
Comments
Suitability
of Zabriskie for studio arts remains an open question.
Major/Program Existing Space /
Ideal Program Proposed Space / Test Results
Studio
Art 9,446 NSF
15,779 NSF 12,300 NSF
STUDIO ARTS & BOOK ARTS ADAPTATION IDEA
Strengths
1.
Creates
physical relationship between Visual Arts and Book Arts, which may allow for
some sharing of materials and facilities.
Weaknesses
1.
Only
2 of 8 proposed faculty offices/studios accommodated
2.
Film
Developing, Clay Mixing, Ceramics Storage compromised in size.
3.
Test
results do not accommodate Senior Projects Space, Junior Projects Space, and
Student Computer called for in the Ideal Program.
4.
No
general classroom or seminar space in test results, but there may be ways to
accommodate.
5.
Shared
Gallery space.
Comments
Significant
space compromises needed, and future growth possibilities are compromised.
Major/Program Existing Space /
Ideal Program Proposed Space / Test Results
Studio
Arts 9,446 NSF
15,779 NSF 9,130
NSF
Book
Arts 1,620 NSF
3,710 NSF 3,650
NSF
SOCIAL SCIENCES & MATHEMATICS/COMPUTER
SCENCE ADAPTATION IDEA
Strengths
1.
Adjacencies
are viable and provide for program flexibility. Learning technology possibilities.
2.
Creates
physical adjacency with new Science Building classrooms, auditorium, and GIS
lab.
3.
7,950
NSF vacated in Macmillan (25 office size spaces, 10 classroom size spaces)
Weaknesses
1.
6 out of 9 programmed classrooms accommodated.
Comments
This
alternative solves extant crowding problems in both academic areas.
Major/Program Existing Space /
Ideal Program Proposed Space / Test Results
Social Sciences
4,940 NSF
7,380 NSF 7,760
NSF
Math. & Comp. Sci.
3,075 NSF
3,960 NSF 3,740
NSF
Support Facilities
135 NSF 960 NSF 1,020
NSF
(Support Facilities: Faculty
Media Center, Writing Center)
HUMANITIES, BOOK ARTS & ART HISTORY
ADAPTATION IDEA
Strengths
1.
1,650
NSF vacated in Macmillan (13 office size spaces); 3,510 NSF vacated in Morgan
(10 office spaces, 3 classroom spaces)
2.
4,715
NSF vacated in Cleveland (13 office size spaces, 6 classroom size spaces, 1
lecture hall size space). Cleveland is architecturally valuable because of its
flexibility, enhancing possibilities for its ultimate use.
Weaknesses
1.
16
of programmed 25 faculty offices accommodated
2.
7
of 15 programmed classrooms accommodated.
3.
Writing
Center not accommodated.
Comments
This
is a scenario that needs fleshing out by knowledgeable people. These academic units are now widely
distributed on campus. This test result
may produce over-crowding. Art Library
is presumed to be accommodated in re-programmed Long Library. tential reduction in classrooms is hard to
assess without further study.
Major/Program Existing Space /
Ideal Program Proposed Space / Test Results
Humanities 8,970 NSF
10,830 NSF 7,715
NSF
Book
Arts 1,620 NSF
3,710 NSF 3,650
NSF
Art
History 2,265 NSF
2,610 NSF 1,940
NSF