English 340: Reading Film

Professor Lohn

 

Spring Semester, 2006

 

Tuesdays: 1:45-4:30

Macmillan 321

 

This is the only paper copy of this syllabus you will receive.  All subsequent changes will be published ONLY on the course web site.  You will find all links to other course documents and material at  http://aurora.wells.edu/~lmlohn/

 

 

Professor Linda M. Lohn

Spring Semester Office Hours

301 Macmillan Hall

On AOL IM (Prof Lohn) Monday 4:30-6:00

Office: 364-3314

Tuesday: 11:05-1:00

Home: (607) 272-9198

Thursday: 11:05-1:00

e-mail: lmlohnwells.edu

 

 

A LIBERAL ARTS EDUCATION: While you will receive a body of knowledge in this course, I am less concerned that you assimilate information than I am that you acquire a particular way of viewing yourself and the material you will read and discuss.  To put it another way, I am much more interested in your “education” than your “training.”

 

Both “training” and “education” are processes, but they differ radically from each other.  “Training” you to complete a task relies upon rote behavior, the lowest form of mental activity.  In training,, the processes and the outcomes are already determined: as a student, you merely accept them, memorize them, and engage in the proper activity.  Actually, “training” is a very comforting way to direct your life.  You have absolutely no responsibility for making a “wrong” decision; the fault inevitably lies in the process you memorized or with the person who trained you.

 

“Education,” in contrast, depends upon your discovering, fostering,, and adopting the habits of intellectual curiosity: giving and accepting guidance and criticism with aplomb and kindness, engaging in meaningful communication with others, and participating actively in a community of  learners.  This way of learning is decidedly not a comforting way to direct your life.  You will make wrong decisions; more disconcerting, you will have to accept the responsibility for them. You will have to challenge yourself to think independently and share your thoughts with folks who will disagree with you.  “Education” is not always “fun.”  Outcomes may not correspond to your expectations.  But, you will learn about yourself; and as you do, learning becomes a joyful process.  Remember Socrates’ adjuration, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”

 

 

This course is governed by the provisions of the Wells College Honor Code.

 

 

 

COURSE GOALS: This course offers a cultural and theoretical approach to the analysis of film, emphasizing its origins in popular culture and examining its unique position on the cusp of art and entertainment.  The major goal is to learn the language of film criticism and the conventions of writing about film.  In addition, we will examine films as historical and cultural artifacts of  American “civilization”. 

 

TEXTS AND READING ASSIGNMENTS: Because this course takes a multi-faceted approach to the study of film, your reading will also range widely.  Along with a text introducing you to the terminology and methods of film analysis, I have ordered two texts which place film firmly in a cultural and historical context.  You should have your own copies of the following texts:

Barsam, Richard, Looking at Movies: an Introduction to Film, Norton (comes with CD)

Corrigan, Timothy, A Short Guide to Writing About Film, 5th edition, Pearson/Longman

Ross, Steven J., Movies and American Society, Blackwell

Sklar, Robert, Movie-Made America, Vintage

Tarantino, Quentin, Pulp Fiction, Hyperion

 

Your responsibility as a reader of these texts is to come to class with the reading completed, to ask questions when you haven’t understood a portion of a text, and to make an honest effort to apply what you have read to the films we will view.

 

VIEWING ASSIGNMENTS: You will view twenty-one films in the class. The titles are listed on the schedule itself.  You may view the films in any way you please: on your personal computer, with friends on DVD players you may find in dorm lounges or the library, on the DVD player in room 307 Mac, with popcorn or without.  As I understand it, our classroom is often locked at night, and you will probably not have access to it. 

 

You may be wondering how you will receive copies of the films for viewing.  The debate about film and the “Fair Use Doctrine” of copyright law is still raging fiercely.  Recently, a company which sold software to defeat the copy-protection encoding on films and allow owners of films to make “backup” copies, was forced to remove the copy-protection-defeating software from its product.  Because the legal issues are complicated,  because this course guide will be published to the web, and because I have no desire to break the law, we will discuss ways in which you might see the films during our first class meeting.

 

WRITING ASSIGNMENTS:  You will write three kinds of essays in this class: first, you will complete three “clip tests”, two to three page analyses of a brief segment of film (follow this link for a detailed explanation of clip tests); you will also write two film reviews of films we have viewed in class or films you have seen on your own, and one critical essay;  finally, in lieu of a final examination, you will complete a critical, analytical, cultural comparison of two films, one we have seen in class and one of your own choosing.  In keeping with college policy, the final paper will be due at the end of the regularly scheduled examination time: 5:00 pm on Friday, May 19th. 

 

On the course web site I have posted a link to a set of grading criteria I will use in assessing your work this semester; read it carefully, and if you are uncertain about ANY of it, please see me or ask about it in class.

 

Because this course is at the 300 level, I will not give specific assignments for the Critical Paper and your Final Paper.  You must design your own topics and thesis statements.  However, virtually every week I will suggest some possible topics.  I would recommend that you visit the office to share your thesis statements if you are worried about them.

 

Read the Statement on Plagiarism posted on the course web site.

 

WRITING ASSIGNMENT LOGISTICS: You will submit all your work to me (except for your final paper) as an e-mail attachments in either MS Word®  or RTF (Rich text format).  NO OTHER FORMATS ARE ACCEPTABLE.  Why? Because I cannot open them on my campus computer.  Documents generated by the Microsoft Works®  word processor are also unacceptable because they are unreadable.  If you do not own MS Word, DO NOT go out and buy it.  Virtually all word processors allow you to save a document in RTF. Your documents must also have a file name that indicates who you are and what paper you are writing.  For example, I would save my first clip test as “ 340 lohn two” because I skipped the first clip test assigned—I just had too much to do for English 385 that week.  So, a good file name is simply your last name and the number of the assignment.  If you are enrolled in more than one class with me, please do place the number of the course before your name in your file name.  I keep your work stored on my computer  throughout the semester.  When you are ready to turn work  in, simply address an e-mail to me (lmlohn@wells.edu), attach your paper (with its simple but informative file name), and push the send button.

 

In its electronic version, your written work must conform to some standard manuscript conventions.  While you  do not need a title page except for your Final Paper, your name and a title must appear on the first page.  More challenging, your title must be meaningful.  You must conform to conventional page numbers and appearance (the first page is counted, but the number “1” does NOT appear; page numbers appear in the upper right-hand corner);  margins should be 1 inch all around; all textual references must be documented according to MLA parenthetical format: include a “works cited” statement.  If you fail to meet any of these standards, your paper will be returned to you graded but without comment. 

 

DEADLINES FOR WRITTEN WORK:  Each professor has her own policies about late  work.  There is no “official” college policy.  In this course, late work is unacceptable.  However, you will be allowed a “way out”: while you must complete three clip tests, I will give you four opportunities.  Clips Tests must be submitted for grading the week after you have viewed the clip. 

 

You may submit your two film reviews and your Critical Paper any time between February 28 and May 2.  In theory, you could wait to submit both your film reviews and your Critical Paper on May 2.  However, work submitted on May 2 will receive a grade but no comments.  That limitation is designed to encourage you to submit work earlier in the term rather than later. 

 

Your Final Paper, due May 19th by 5:00 pm, must be submitted on time in hard copy.  If your paper is late, you will fail the course (to put it simply but brutally) . 

 

 

 

 

 

GRADING:  Your grade will be distributed as follows:

 

 

Three Clip Tests

30% (10% apiece)

Two  Film Reviews 

20%  (10% apiece )

Analytical Paper

15%

Participation and Attendance

10%

Final Paper

25%

 

If you do not complete the Final Paper, you will not pass the course.

 

CLASS PARTICIPATION AND ATTENDANCE:  It is essential that you attend class, not only because showing up is important practice for your future, but also because discussion and exchanging ideas is at the foundation of a liberal arts education and the founding principle of my philosophy of teaching.  Certainly, you may question my philosophy and I will be happy to discuss this policy with you;  nevertheless, I will adhere to the following template for grading participation and attendance:   

 

·        "A"—(no more than one  absence) Takes the initiative in class on a regular basis, provides original and valuable insights, information or service to the class.

·        "B"—(no more than one absences) Demonstrates good levels of volunteer leadership and participation, but on a lower level than expected for an "A", or on an inconsistent basis.

·        "C"—( no more than two  absences) Average  attendance and/or doesn’t volunteer in class discussion, or only volunteers under crisis (if called upon by name, for example).

·        "D"—(automatic with three absences) Merely bodily presence.

·        "F"—Progressively more unsatisfactory levels of attendance, obvious lack of preparation and engagement with the class.

 

CONFERENCES AND OFFICE HOURS: I would encourage you to visit my office  whenever you have questions about reading or writing assignments, comments or questions about class discussion, a desire to continue pursuing issues or topics which arose in class, a wish to try out an idea you aren’t quite ready to share with your classmates, or simply a longing to sit down in an old, beaten-up but comfortable chair.  I will endeavor to keep my office hours faithfully; however, I occasionally may be called away by a campus meeting or other unexpected, pressing commitment.  In that case, I will provide you advance notice.  You do not need to make an appointment to come to office hours; however, if you do make an appointment, make certain that you show up!  (Remember, a dentist or doctor will charge you for an appointment if you don’t give a 24 hour cancellation notice.).  Please remember to use the AOL IM office hours on Monday.  Too often your professor overdoses on computer games simply because no better entertainment comes along!

 

 

Schedule

 

Jan 31

Introduction to Course

GOALS: What this course is NOT!

METHODS: Juggling three approaches to film

EXPECTATIONS: Why is there a syllabus in this class?

VIEW IN CLASS: Movies of the Twenties, Thirties, and Forties

 

 

February. 7

Silent Films and Social Criticism

 

VIEW: The Crowd, King Vidor (1928)

VIEW: Modern Times, Charles Chaplin (1936)

READ: Timothy Corrigan, A Short Guide to Writing about Film Chapters 1-3

READ:  Richard Barsam, Looking at Movies, Chapter 1

VIEW IN CLASS:  Film: Twentieth Century Legacy

 

February 14

Film Noir

 

VIEW: The Maltese Falcon (1941)

VIEW: Double Indemnity, Billy Wilder (1944)

READ:  Richard Barsam, Looking at Movies, Chapter 2

READ: Timothy Corrigan, A Short Guide to Writing about Film Chapters 4-5

OF INTEREST:  Screenplay for Double Indemnity

 

February 21

Romance, or The Things We Do For Love

 

VIEW: Dodsworth, William Wyler (1936)

VIEW: A Place in the Sun, George Stevens (1952)

READ: Timothy Corrigan, A Short Guide to Writing about Film Chapters 5-6

READ: Linda M. Lohn “Camera Eyes and Sebaceous Glands:  Dif(De)Fusing Identity in

George Stevens’ A Place in the Sun”

VIEW IN CLASS: Legacy of the Hollywood Blacklist

 

 

February 28

Buddy Films

 

VIEW: The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, John Huston (1948)

VIEW: The Wild Bunch (1969)

READ:  Richard Barsam, Looking at Movies, Chapters 3 and 4

 

 

March 7

Chick Flicks

 

VIEW: Stage Door, Gregory La Cava (1937)

VIEW: Thelma and Louise, Ridley Scott (1991)

READ:  Richard Barsam, Looking at Movies, Chapter 5

VIEW IN CLASS: The Role of Women in the Movies

OF INTEREST: Screenplay for Thelma and Louise

 

 

March 14

 Gender Benders

 

VIEW: Some Like it Hot, Billy Wilder (1959)

VIEW: Boys Don’t Cry , Kimberley Pierce (1999)

READ:  Richard Barsam, Looking at Movies, Chapter 6

VIEW IN CLASS: Hollywood’s Role in Shaping Values: David Puttnam

 

 

March 21-- Spring Break

 

 

March 28

The Cold War and the Space Race

 

VIEW: Dr. Strangelove, Stanley Kubrick (1964)

VIEW: 2001: A Space Odyssey, Stanley Kubrick (1968)

READ:  Richard Barsam, Looking at Movies, Chapter 7

READ: Robert Sklar, Movie-Made America: Part 1: Chapters 1-3

READ: Steven Ross, Movies and American Society: Chapters 1-3

OF INTEREST: Early scripts of Dr. Strangelove and 2001

 

 

April 4

 The “Epic” Film

 

VIEW: Lawrence of Arabia, David Lean (1962)

READ: Robert Sklar, Movie-Made America: Part 3: Chapters 10-11, 14

READ: Steven Ross, Movies and American Society: Chapters 7-8

 

 

 

 

April 11

Two Directors: Alfred Hitchcock and Woody Allen

 

VIEW: Rear Window (1954)

VIEW: Manhattan Murder Mystery (1993)

READ: Robert Sklar, Movie-Made America: Part 4: Chapters 15-16

READ: Steven Ross, Movies and American Society: Chapters 9-10

 

 

April 18

Alternate Visions and Social Criticism

 

VIEW: Blade Runner, Ridley Scott (1991)

VIEW: Batman Begins (2005)

READ: Steven Ross, Movies and American Society: Chapter 11

OF INTEREST: Script for Blade Runner

 

 

April 25

The Chronicles of “Noir”nia?

 

VIEW: Chinatown, Roman Polanski, (1974)

OF INTEREST: Script for Chinatown

 

 

May 2

Four Tales of Violence and Redemption: Art Imitates Life

 

VIEW: Pulp Fiction, Quentin Tarantino (1994)

READ: Quentin Tarantino, screenplay for Pulp Fiction

 

 

 

May 9

The shame of Hollywood: The role of “other” in popular film

 

VIEW IN CLASS: Small Steps, Big Strides: The Black Experience in Hollywood