|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TEACHING STANDARDS
RUBRIC |
|
|
|
| Quality |
|
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
|
Meets Expectations |
|
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
|
| |
|
|
(A) |
|
|
(B) |
|
|
(C) |
|
|
(U) |
|
|
| Content
Knowledge: |
1. |
6/11 |
reveals a thorough knowledge of |
1. |
5/11 |
conveys solid knowledge of content |
1. |
1/11 |
conveys content knowledge that is |
1. |
|
conveys knowledge of content that is |
|
| The extent to which the |
|
|
content and an ability to prioritize |
|
|
|
|
|
sometimes incomplete or not up-to-date |
|
|
frequently inaccurate and out-of-date |
|
| teacher demonstrates |
|
|
important learnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| knowledge of subject matter |
2. |
5/11 |
consistently communicates |
2. |
5/11 |
demonstrates effective presentation |
2. |
1/11 |
occasionally has difficulty |
2. |
|
presentation of knowledge is often |
|
| and curriculum |
|
|
knowledge clearly and effectively |
|
|
skills |
|
|
communicating knowledge clearly |
|
|
confusing |
|
| |
3. |
6/11 |
makes thoughtful consistent |
3. |
4/11 |
regularly and independently connects |
3. |
1/11 |
can connect standards to curriculum |
3. |
|
appears to have little understanding of |
|
| |
|
|
connections to New York State |
|
|
standards to curriculum |
|
|
with minimal support of cooperating |
|
|
standards and their connection to |
|
| |
|
|
and National Standards |
|
|
|
|
|
teacher |
|
|
curriculum |
|
| |
4. |
6/11 |
uses a variety of
quality |
4. |
4/11 |
consistently uses sound resources |
4. |
1/11 |
relies heavily on textbooks, |
4. |
|
relies solely on textbooks |
|
| |
|
|
resources to support the texts |
|
|
beyond textbooks |
|
|
occasionally uses outside resources |
|
|
|
|
| |
5. |
4/11 |
breaks content down
into |
5. |
5/11 |
successfully breaks down content |
5. |
1/11 |
attempts to break down content into |
5. |
|
weak analysis of content makes |
|
| |
|
|
understandable concepts while |
|
|
into understandable concepts |
|
|
understandable concepts |
|
|
learning difficult for students |
|
| |
|
|
working to expand higher level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6. |
7/11 |
employs relevant questioning |
6. |
4/11 |
asks a range of purposeful questions |
6. |
|
asks
questions that are limited in range |
6. |
|
questions are infrequent and show a |
|
| |
|
|
techniques, is responsive and |
|
|
and responds thoroughly to student |
|
|
and thinking skills required, occasional |
|
|
limited or simplistic understanding of |
|
| |
|
|
encourages students to think |
|
|
questions |
|
|
difficulty responding to student |
|
|
content. Student
questions are not |
|
| |
|
|
critically and independently |
|
|
|
|
|
questions - responses may be |
|
|
addressed or show limited |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
incomplete |
|
|
understanding of content |
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quality |
|
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
|
Meets Expectations |
|
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
(A) |
|
|
(B) |
|
|
(C) |
|
|
(U) |
|
| Preparation: |
1. |
6/11 |
consistently makes clear connections |
1. |
5/11 |
makes clear connections between |
1. |
|
limited
focus on connecting |
1. |
|
makes no connection between |
|
| The extent to which the |
|
|
between curriculum/district goals |
|
|
curriculum goals and standards |
|
|
curriculum/district goals with standards |
|
|
curriculum/district goals and standards |
|
| teacher demonstrates |
|
|
and standards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| knowledge of pedagogy in |
2. |
5/11 |
demonstrates a solid knowledge of |
2. |
5/11 |
conveys a knowledge of student |
2. |
1/11 |
conveys a shallow
knowledge of |
2. |
|
minimal or no evidence
of |
|
| lesson planning |
|
|
student development through the use |
|
|
development through the use of |
|
|
student development through the |
|
|
knowledge of student development |
|
| |
|
|
of developmentally appropriate |
|
|
appropriate instructional materials |
|
|
occasional use of inappropriate |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
instructional material and strategies |
|
|
and strategies |
|
|
instruction materials and strategies |
|
|
|
|
| |
3. |
5/11 |
lesson/curriculum plans are complete, |
3. |
4/11 |
has clear lesson plan with instructional |
3. |
2/11 |
develops plans but may be incomplete |
3. |
|
little evidence that planning has taken |
|
| |
|
|
thoughtful, rich using appropriate, |
|
|
objectives at
appropriate level of |
|
|
or show a superficial understanding of |
|
|
place. Appears to
frequently "wing it". |
|
| |
|
|
measurable objectives and thorough |
|
|
difficulty. Information needed for |
|
|
effective lesson design.
Objectives |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
information needed for effective |
|
|
implementation is
complete. |
|
|
may be unclear. Minimal
attention may |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
implementation.
Engagement |
|
|
Engagement strategies and |
|
|
be paid to engagement
and |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
strategies and assessment are |
|
|
assessment are evident |
|
|
assessment |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
clearly evident |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4. |
7/11 |
in planning, makes student relevant |
4. |
4/11 |
in planning makes connections between |
4. |
|
planning may focus
on the present |
4. |
|
Lessons appear to be taught in |
|
| |
|
|
connections between past, present |
|
|
past, present, and future learning |
|
|
learning with minimal connection to |
|
|
isolation of past or future learning |
|
| |
|
|
and future learning |
|
|
|
|
|
past or future learning |
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quality |
|
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
|
Meets Expectations |
|
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
(A) |
|
|
(B) |
|
|
(C) |
|
|
(U) |
|
| Instructional
Delivery |
1. |
7/11 |
demonstrates an instructional |
1. |
2/11 |
demonstrates an instructional delivery |
1. |
1/11 |
demonstrates instructional delivery |
1. |
|
demonstrates inadequate instructional |
|
| The extent to which the teacher |
|
|
delivery that is characterized by |
|
|
that fosters student involvement; |
|
|
that is characterized by limited student |
|
|
delivery characterized by little or no |
|
| teacher
demonstrates |
|
|
active student involvement; |
|
|
encourages student/teacher |
|
|
engagement and unclear instructional |
|
|
student engagement and little or no |
|
| knowledge of instructional |
|
|
positive and frequent student/ |
|
|
interaction; appropriate instructional; |
|
|
goals |
|
|
sense of direction |
|
| delivery |
|
|
teacher interaction; meaningful |
|
|
goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
instructional goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2. |
6/11 |
communicates clearly and fully |
2. |
4/11 |
communicates effectively |
2. |
1/11 |
is occasionally
confusing when |
2. |
|
communicates ineffectively - difficult |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
communicating to students |
|
|
for students to understand |
|
| |
3. |
3/11 |
utilizes a variety of teaching styles |
3. |
8/11 |
utilizes a few teaching styles to address |
3. |
|
relies on one or two teaching styles |
3. |
|
relies on one teaching style with little or |
|
| |
|
|
to address multiple learning styles |
|
|
multiple learning styles or intelligences |
|
|
with occasional variance to address |
|
|
no attempt to address multiple learning |
|
| |
|
|
or intelligences |
|
|
|
|
|
multiple learning styles or intelligences |
|
|
styles or intelligences |
|
| |
4. |
4/11 |
uses teaching time
effectively - |
4. |
5/11 |
is clearly conscious of using time |
4. |
2/11 |
attempts to use
time effectively but |
4. |
|
appears unaware of instructional time |
|
| |
|
|
pacing, students on task, transitions, |
|
|
effectively and works to maintain |
|
|
struggles to maintain appropriate pace, |
|
|
management. Lesson time may be |
|
| |
|
|
etc. |
|
|
appropriate place, time on task, etc. |
|
|
time on task, etc. |
|
|
often underutilized or overextended |
|
| |
5. |
2/11 |
closely monitors student |
5. |
8/11 |
monitors student understanding |
5. |
|
student
understanding is monitored |
5. |
|
limited active engagement makes it |
|
| |
|
|
understanding throughout lesson by |
|
|
regularly during lesson using active |
|
|
inconsistently. Lesson
plan is seldom |
|
|
very difficult to monitor student |
|
| |
|
|
using a variety of active engagement |
|
|
engagement strategies and adjusting |
|
|
altered as a result of monitoring |
|
|
understanding. May
disregard learning |
|
| |
|
|
strategies and insightfully adjusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evidence when teaching lesson |
|
| |
|
|
instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6. |
4/11 |
relevant, varied technology is |
6. |
4/11 |
regular use of technology supports |
6. |
2/11 |
technology to support instruction is |
6. |
1/11 |
supportive technology is seldom, if ever, |
|
| |
|
|
integrated thoughtfully into instruction |
|
|
instruction |
|
|
used occasionally |
|
|
integrated into instruction |
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quality |
|
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
|
Meets Expectations |
|
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
(A) |
|
|
(B) |
|
|
(C) |
|
|
(U) |
|
| Classroom |
1. |
8/11 |
effectively works to create a |
1. |
2/11 |
clearly attempts to create a
climate |
1. |
1/11 |
attempts to create a positive |
1. |
|
pays little or no attention
to creating |
|
| Management |
|
|
climate that promotes responsibility, |
|
|
that promotes responsibility, fairness, |
|
|
classroom climate but shows |
|
|
a positive classroom environment |
|
| The extent to which the |
|
|
fairness, self-respect and respect |
|
|
self-respect and respect for others |
|
|
minimal focus and follow-through |
|
|
|
|
| teacher demonstrates |
|
|
for others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| effective management |
2. |
8/11 |
establishes and consistently |
2. |
2/11 |
establishes and maintains routines, |
2. |
|
routines, procedures and standards |
2. |
|
classroom routines, procedures and |
|
| skills |
|
|
maintains classroom routines, |
|
|
procedures, and standards of |
|
|
of behavior are
established but |
|
|
standards or behavior are not |
|
| |
|
|
procedures, and
consistent |
|
|
student behavior |
|
|
unclear or reinforced inconsistently. |
|
|
apparent. Inappropriate
behavior is |
|
| |
|
|
standards or student behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
Inappropriate behavior may be |
|
|
consistently ignore, classroom may |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
regularly ignored |
|
|
appear chaotic |
|
| |
3. |
8/11 |
situations involving challenging |
3. |
3/11 |
attempts to respectfully address |
3. |
1/11 |
attempts to address challenging |
3. |
|
challenging student behavior is |
|
| |
|
|
student behavior are handled |
|
|
challenging student
behavior. |
|
|
student behavior show
limited |
|
|
frequent and strategies to address |
|
| |
|
|
confidently and respectfully with a |
|
|
Consistent growth can
be seen |
|
|
understanding of student needs and |
|
|
are often ineffective |
|
| |
|
|
range of strategies and frequent |
|
|
throughout the student teaching |
|
|
are frequently unsuccessful |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
success |
|
|
experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4. |
6/11 |
maintains a physical environment |
4. |
3/11 |
maintains a physical environment that |
4. |
1/11 |
attends to the physical environment. |
4. |
|
shows little awareness of physical |
|
| |
|
|
that is safe, positive and enhances |
|
|
is safe, comfortable and conducive |
|
|
Environment may be
safe but does |
|
|
environment and its impact on |
|
| |
|
|
learning |
|
|
to learning |
|
|
little to support student learning |
|
|
learning |
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|