|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Student:________________________________________________ |
|
Date:___________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cooperating
Teacher:_____________________________________ |
School:_________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade
Level/Subject:______________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TEACHING STANDARDS
RUBRIC |
|
|
|
| Quality |
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Meets Expectations |
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Content Knowledge: |
1. |
reveals a thorough knowledge of |
1. |
conveys solid knowledge of content |
1. |
conveys content knowledge that is |
1. |
conveys knowledge of content that is |
|
| The extent to which the |
|
content and an ability to prioritize |
|
|
|
sometimes incomplete or not up-to-date |
|
frequently inaccurate and out-of-date |
|
| teacher demonstrates |
|
important learnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| knowledge of subject matter |
2. |
consistently communicates |
2. |
demonstrates effective presentation |
2. |
occasionally has difficulty |
2. |
presentation of knowledge is often |
|
| and curriculum |
|
knowledge clearly and effectively |
|
skills |
|
communicating knowledge clearly |
|
confusing |
|
| |
3. |
makes thoughtful consistent |
3. |
regularly and independently connects |
3. |
can connect standards to curriculum |
3. |
appears to have little understanding of |
|
| |
|
connections to New York State |
|
standards to curriculum |
|
with minimal support of cooperating |
|
standards and their connection to |
|
| |
|
and National Standards |
|
|
|
teacher |
|
curriculum |
|
| |
4. |
uses a variety of
quality |
4. |
consistently uses sound resources |
4. |
relies heavily on textbooks, |
4. |
relies solely on textbooks |
|
| |
|
resources to support the texts |
|
beyond textbooks |
|
occasionally uses outside resources |
|
|
|
| |
5. |
breaks content down
into |
5. |
successfully breaks down content |
5. |
attempts to break down content into |
5. |
weak analysis of content makes |
|
| |
|
understandable concepts while |
|
into understandable concepts |
|
understandable concepts |
|
learning difficult for students |
|
| |
|
working to expand higher level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6. |
employs relevant questioning |
6. |
asks a range of purposeful questions |
6. |
asks
questions that are limited in range |
6. |
questions are infrequent and show a |
|
| |
|
techniques, is responsive and |
|
and responds thoroughly to student |
|
and thinking skills required, occasional |
|
limited or simplistic understanding of |
|
| |
|
encourages students to think |
|
questions |
|
difficulty responding to student |
|
content. Student
questions are not |
|
| |
|
critically and independently |
|
|
|
questions - responses may be |
|
addressed or show limited |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
incomplete |
|
understanding of content |
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 9 |
|
|
ST Evaluation Rubric R10/18/07 |
|
|
|
|
| Quality |
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Meets Expectations |
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Preparation: |
1. |
consistently makes clear connections |
1. |
makes clear connections between |
1. |
limited focus on
connecting |
1. |
makes no connection between |
|
| The extent to which the |
|
between curriculum/district goals |
|
curriculum goals and standards |
|
curriculum/district goals with standards |
|
curriculum/district goals and standards |
|
| teacher demonstrates |
|
and standards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| knowledge of pedagogy in |
2. |
demonstrates a solid knowledge of |
2. |
conveys a knowledge of student |
2. |
conveys a shallow
knowledge of |
2. |
minimal or no evidence
of |
|
| lesson planning |
|
student development through the use |
|
development through the use of |
|
student development through the |
|
knowledge of student development |
|
| |
|
of developmentally appropriate |
|
appropriate instructional materials |
|
occasional use of inappropriate |
|
|
|
| |
|
instructional material and strategies |
|
and strategies |
|
instruction materials and strategies |
|
|
|
| |
3. |
lesson/curriculum plans are complete, |
3. |
has clear lesson plan with instructional |
3. |
develops plans but may be incomplete |
3. |
little evidence that planning has taken |
|
| |
|
thoughtful, rich using appropriate, |
|
objectives at
appropriate level of |
|
or show a superficial understanding of |
|
place. Appears to
frequently "wing it". |
|
| |
|
measurable objectives and thorough |
|
difficulty. Information needed for |
|
effective lesson design.
Objectives |
|
|
|
| |
|
information needed for effective |
|
implementation is
complete. |
|
may be unclear. Minimal
attention may |
|
|
|
| |
|
implementation.
Engagement |
|
Engagement strategies and |
|
be paid to engagement
and |
|
|
|
| |
|
strategies and assessment are |
|
assessment are evident |
|
assessment |
|
|
|
| |
|
clearly evident |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4. |
in planning, makes student relevant |
4. |
in planning makes connections between |
4. |
planning may focus
on the present |
4. |
Lessons appear to be taught in |
|
| |
|
connections between past, present |
|
past, present, and future learning |
|
learning with minimal connection to |
|
isolation of past or future learning |
|
| |
|
and future learning |
|
|
|
past or future learning |
|
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 9 |
|
|
ST Evaluation Rubric R10/18/07 |
|
| Quality |
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Meets Expectations |
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Instructional Delivery |
1. |
demonstrates an instructional |
1. |
demonstrates an instructional delivery |
1. |
demonstrates instructional delivery |
1. |
demonstrates inadequate instructional |
|
| The extent to which the teacher |
|
delivery that is characterized by |
|
that fosters student involvement; |
|
that is characterized by limited student |
|
delivery characterized by little or no |
|
| teacher
demonstrates |
|
active student involvement; |
|
encourages student/teacher |
|
engagement and unclear instructional |
|
student engagement and little or no |
|
| knowledge of instructional |
|
positive and frequent student/ |
|
interaction; appropriate instructional; |
|
goals |
|
sense of direction |
|
| delivery |
|
teacher interaction; meaningful |
|
goals |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
instructional goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2. |
communicates clearly and fully |
2. |
communicates effectively |
2. |
is occasionally
confusing when |
2. |
communicates ineffectively - difficult |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
communicating to students |
|
for students to understand |
|
| |
3. |
utilizes a variety of teaching styles |
3. |
utilizes a few teaching styles to address |
3. |
relies on one or two teaching styles |
3. |
relies on one teaching style with little or |
|
| |
|
to address multiple learning styles |
|
multiple learning styles or intelligences |
|
with occasional variance to address |
|
no attempt to address multiple learning |
|
| |
|
or intelligences |
|
|
|
multiple learning styles or intelligences |
|
styles or intelligences |
|
| |
4. |
uses teaching time
effectively - |
4. |
is clearly conscious of using time |
4. |
attempts to use
time effectively but |
4. |
appears unaware of instructional time |
|
| |
|
pacing, students on task, transitions, |
|
effectively and works to maintain |
|
struggles to maintain appropriate pace, |
|
management. Lesson time may be |
|
| |
|
etc. |
|
appropriate place, time on task, etc. |
|
time on task, etc. |
|
often underutilized or overextended |
|
| |
5. |
closely monitors student |
5. |
monitors student understanding |
5. |
student
understanding is monitored |
5. |
limited active engagement makes it |
|
| |
|
understanding throughout lesson by |
|
regularly during lesson using active |
|
inconsistently. Lesson
plan is seldom |
|
very difficult to monitor student |
|
| |
|
using a variety of active engagement |
|
engagement strategies and adjusting |
|
altered as a result of monitoring |
|
understanding. May
disregard learning |
|
| |
|
strategies and insightfully adjusts |
|
|
|
|
|
evidence when teaching lesson |
|
| |
|
instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6. |
relevant, varied technology is |
6. |
regular use of technology supports |
6. |
technology to support instruction is |
6. |
supportive technology is seldom, if ever, |
|
| |
|
integrated thoughtfully into instruction |
|
instruction |
|
used occasionally |
|
integrated into instruction |
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3 of 9 |
|
|
ST Evaluation Rubric R10/18/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quality |
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Meets Expectations |
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Classroom |
1. |
effectively works to create a |
1. |
clearly attempts
to create a climate |
1. |
attempts to create a positive |
1. |
pays little
or no attention to creating |
|
| Management |
|
climate that promotes responsibility, |
|
that promotes responsibility, fairness, |
|
classroom climate but shows |
|
a positive classroom environment |
|
| The extent to which the |
|
fairness, self-respect and respect |
|
self-respect and respect for others |
|
minimal focus and follow-through |
|
|
|
| teacher demonstrates |
|
for others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| effective management |
2. |
establishes and consistently |
2. |
establishes and maintains routines, |
2. |
routines, procedures and standards |
2. |
classroom routines, procedures and |
|
| skills |
|
maintains classroom routines, |
|
procedures, and standards of |
|
of behavior are
established but |
|
standards or behavior are not |
|
| |
|
procedures, and
consistent |
|
student behavior |
|
unclear or reinforced inconsistently. |
|
apparent. Inappropriate
behavior is |
|
| |
|
standards or student behavior |
|
|
|
Inappropriate behavior may be |
|
consistently ignore, classroom may |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
regularly ignored |
|
appear chaotic |
|
| |
3. |
situations involving challenging |
3. |
attempts to respectfully address |
3. |
attempts to address challenging |
3. |
challenging student behavior is |
|
| |
|
student behavior are handled |
|
challenging student
behavior. |
|
student behavior show
limited |
|
frequent and strategies to address |
|
| |
|
confidently and respectfully with a |
|
Consistent growth can
be seen |
|
understanding of student needs and |
|
are often ineffective |
|
| |
|
range of strategies and frequent |
|
throughout the student teaching |
|
are frequently unsuccessful |
|
|
|
| |
|
success |
|
experience |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4. |
maintains a physical environment |
4. |
maintains a physical environment that |
4. |
attends to the physical environment. |
4. |
shows little awareness of physical |
|
| |
|
that is safe, positive and enhances |
|
is safe, comfortable and conducive |
|
Environment may be
safe but does |
|
environment and its impact on |
|
| |
|
learning |
|
to learning |
|
little to support student learning |
|
learning |
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4 of 9 |
|
|
ST Evaluation Rubric R10/18/07 |
|
|
| Quality |
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Meets Expectations |
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Knowledge/ |
1. |
clearly demonstrates an |
1. |
appears to have a general |
1. |
exhibits a limited understanding of |
1. |
exhibits little or no understanding of |
|
| Appreciation of |
|
understanding of students' |
|
understanding of students' |
|
students' developmental stages |
|
students' developmental stages |
|
| Student Development |
|
developmental stages |
|
developmental stages |
|
|
|
|
|
| and Diversity |
2. |
utilizes a variety of developmentally |
2. |
employs developmentally appropriate |
2. |
instruction is provided with minimal |
2. |
does not appear to
consider |
|
| The extent to which the |
|
appropriate
instructional strategies |
|
strategies that accommodates |
|
consideration of developmental |
|
developmental needs or learning |
|
| teacher displays a knowledge |
|
that address a range of learning |
|
students'
learning styles. Attempts to |
|
needs or learning styles |
|
styles when designing instruction |
|
| of student development |
|
styles. Regularly
individualizes and |
|
individualize and differentiate |
|
|
|
|
|
| and/or student diversity |
|
differentiates instruction |
|
instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3. |
consistently and sensitively considers |
3. |
usually considers differences in |
3. |
attempts to consider differences in |
3. |
pays little attention to differences in |
|
| |
|
differences in culture, background, |
|
culture, background, ethnicity, etc. |
|
background, ethnicity, etc. appear |
|
culture, background, ethnicity, etc. |
|
| |
|
ethnicity, etc. when relating to and |
|
when relating to and instructing |
|
incomplete or inconsistent |
|
when relating to individual instruction |
|
| |
|
instructing individual children |
|
individual children |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4. |
comfortably modifies instruction and |
4. |
minimal support is needed to modify |
4. |
struggles with providing individual |
4. |
shows little interest in reading IEP. |
|
| |
|
accommodates needs of classified |
|
instruction and accommodate needs |
|
support to classified students. Is |
|
May disregard recommendations |
|
| |
|
students. Consistently
applies |
|
of classified students.
Clearly works |
|
willing but needs substantial support |
|
when working with classified student |
|
| |
|
recommendations of IEP |
|
to apply recommendations of IEP |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5 of 9 |
|
|
ST Evaluation Rubric R10/18/07 |
|
|
| Quality |
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Meets Expectations |
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Student Assessment |
1. |
clearly communicates learning goals |
1. |
communicates learning goals to |
1. |
Learning goals may be inferred by |
1. |
difficult for students or observers |
|
| The extent to which the |
|
to students and refers back to those |
|
students |
|
students |
|
to identify learning goals |
|
| employs
assessment |
|
goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| techniques based on |
2. |
uses a variety of means
and |
2. |
uses a variety of means
and |
2. |
utilizes a limited variety of means to |
2. |
assessment is narrow (only one |
|
| appropriate
learning |
|
instruments (performance |
|
assessments to assess student |
|
assess student achievement of |
|
form) incomplete or does not address |
|
| standards |
|
assessment, instruction embedded |
|
achievement of learning goals and |
|
learning goals and standards.
May |
|
learning goals and standards |
|
| |
|
assessment,
observation, etc.) to |
|
standards |
|
rely heavily on traditional assessment |
|
|
|
| |
|
assess student
achievement of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
learning goals and standards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3. |
consistently uses assessment |
3. |
uses assessment
results to plan |
3. |
plans instruction with limited |
3. |
instruction is planned without |
|
| |
|
results to plan instruction |
|
instruction |
|
reference to assessment results |
|
considering past assessment results |
|
| |
4. |
maintains complete records of |
4. |
maintains appropriate records of |
4. |
records of student performance may |
4. |
maintains inaccurate or confusing |
|
| |
|
student performance |
|
student performance |
|
be incomplete |
|
records of student performance |
|
| |
5. |
consistently promotes student |
5. |
regularly requests
that students |
5. |
occasionally asks students to |
5. |
rarely if ever asks students to |
|
| |
|
self-assessment |
|
reflect and self-assess |
|
reflect and self-assess |
|
reflect and self-assess |
|
| |
6. |
Grading is consistently supported |
6. |
grading is supported by regular use |
6. |
grading is inconsistent.
Criteria may |
6. |
grading appears random and poorly |
|
| |
|
by clearly defined criteria and well |
|
of criteria and rubrics |
|
be confusing or limited to checklists |
|
thought out |
|
| |
|
thought out rubrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6 of 9 |
|
|
ST Evaluation Rubric R10/18/07 |
|
|
| Quality |
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Meets Expectations |
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Collaboration |
1. |
develops effective collaborative |
1. |
develops collaborative relationships |
1. |
maintains cordial relationships with |
1. |
maintains negative
or self-serving |
|
| |
|
relationship with colleagues to meet |
|
with colleagues to meet the learning |
|
colleagues to meet the learning |
|
relationships with colleagues |
|
| |
|
the learning needs of students |
|
needs of students |
|
needs of students |
|
|
|
| |
2. |
develops effective collaborative |
2. |
develops collaborative relationships |
2. |
makes inconsistent attempts to |
2. |
makes little or no attempt to develop |
|
| |
|
relationship with
students, and |
|
with students to meet the learning |
|
develop collaborative relationships |
|
collaborative relationships with |
|
| |
|
students have an active
and |
|
needs of students; facilitates student |
|
with students |
|
students |
|
| |
|
meaningful role in the classroom |
|
participation, accepting and using |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
suggestions/ideas from students |
|
participates in team planning etc. |
|
avoids becoming involved in team, |
|
| |
3. |
volunteers to participate in school |
3. |
participates in team planning/ |
3. |
when specifically asked but shows |
3. |
school and district projects |
|
| |
|
or district projects, along with |
|
curriculum planning,
etc. in a |
|
little initiation |
|
|
|
| |
|
collaborating on team and curriculum |
|
collaborative manner |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
planning |
|
|
|
participates in the school's activities |
|
provides minimal
information to |
|
| |
4. |
communicates regularly
and |
4. |
provides information to parents, as |
4. |
for parent communication but offers |
4. |
parents and does not respond or |
|
| |
|
effectively to parents on a range of |
|
appropriate, about the instructional |
|
little additional information.
Adheres |
|
responds insensitively to parent |
|
| |
|
issues - course information, student |
|
program. Communicates
with parents |
|
to the school's required procedures |
|
concerns about students |
|
| |
|
progress (positive
and negative) |
|
about students
progress and course |
|
for communicating to parents |
|
|
|
| |
|
etc. Appears responsive and |
|
information on a
regular basis. Is |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
sensitive to parents concerns |
|
responsive to parent concerns |
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 7 of 9 |
|
|
ST Evaluation Rubric R10/18/07 |
|
|
| Quality |
|
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Meets Expectations |
|
Approaching Expectations |
|
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reflection |
1. |
makes a thoughtful and accurate |
|
makes an accurate assessment of |
1. |
makes a general but accurate |
1. |
does not know if a lesson was |
|
| |
|
assessment of a lesson's |
1. |
a lesson's effectiveness and the |
|
impression of a lesson's effectiveness |
|
effective or achieved its goals, or |
|
| |
|
effectiveness and the extent to |
|
extent to which it achieved its goal; |
|
and the extent to which instructional |
|
profoundly misjudged the success |
|
| |
|
which it achieved its goals; cites |
|
cites general
references to support |
|
goals were met |
|
of a lesson |
|
| |
|
many specific examples from the |
|
the judgment |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
lesson and weighs the relative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
strength of each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2. |
initiates specific, alternative |
|
makes a few specific alternative |
2. |
makes general
suggestions about |
2. |
makes few or no
suggestions on |
|
| |
|
adjustments as needed |
2. |
adjustments with minimal guidance of |
|
how a lesson may be improved. |
|
how a lesson may be improved |
|
| |
|
|
|
cooperating teacher |
|
Needs much guidance
from |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cooperating teacher |
|
|
|
| |
3. |
accepts feedback and constructive |
|
appears responsive to feedback and |
3. |
appears reluctant to
accept |
3. |
appears closed to feedback and |
|
| |
|
criticism in a positive, open manner. |
3. |
constructive
criticism and clearly |
|
feedback and constructive |
|
criticism. May respond
defensively |
|
| |
|
Consistently strives to improve |
|
wants to improve |
|
criticism. Occasionally may be |
|
or negatively. Consistently |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
unresponsive to suggestions |
|
unresponsive to suggestions |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|