EDUC 315
The Inclusive Classroom
“Ticket
in the Door” . . .
Length
7-9 full pages
Varied
resources, 5+
Typed 12 font
1 1/2-double spaced
4
Research
is extensive. Sources cited are
credible, varied and clearly support the topic.
Information
shared is accurate and extensive. The writer has “digested” the information and
shares her learning in her own words with sources cited. Insightful connections are made throughout
and demonstrate a deep understanding of the topic.
The
writing is authoritative. The paper
begins in a compelling manner, flows smoothly through the body and concludes
strongly.
Organization
enhances the overall impact of the paper.
The controlling idea or essential question is clearly presented in the
introduction. The main points are
clearly stated and are supported by many rich, relevant details.
Flawless
use of writing mechanics makes the paper very easy to read and understand.
3
Research
is complete and thorough. Sources are
credible and support the topic.
Information
shared is accurate and thorough. Clear
connections are made throughout and paraphrasing with cited sources is
evident. It is obvious that the writer
knows about this topic.
The
writing is clear and focused. The paper
holds the reader’s interest throughout and a conclusion is obvious.
The
paper is well organized. The controlling
idea is clearly stated. The main points
are presented with some elaboration and specific, relevant details.
The
mechanics of writing have been attended to.
Errors are few and do not interfere with understanding.
2
Research
is evident but sources may be few or lacking in variety or credibility.
Information
shared is limited, incomplete or has some inaccuracies. Writing may frequently use verbatim text from
sources. The reader is left with the
impression that the writer’s understanding of the topic is limited or
superficial.
The
writing is unfocused and does little to engage the reader.
Organization
is attempted but the paper may be difficult to follow at times. Main points are general or unclear with
little support or elaboration. Writing
may rely on opinion to carry the paper.
Errors
in mechanics interfere with understanding the paper.
1
Research
is very limited. May rely on one or two
resources. Credibility is questionable.
Little
accurate information is provided. Paper
appears to be “smoke and mirrors” with little substance. May consist of extensive opinions and
personal reflection.
Writing
is very thin or brief with little focus.
Paper
is difficult to follow because of poor organization.
Errors
in mechanics make paper difficult to read.