Present: C. Bellomo, K. Edgin, T. Lumumba-Kasongo, L.
Miller-Bernal, N. Pellegrino, D. Reis.
Meeting
called to order at
1. Minutes of
12/9 approved as submitted
2. There was
discussion around the best way to share the information the committee has
gathered. It was decided that sharing the summary at a regular faculty meeting
and then having a special meeting of the faculty if necessary, or preparing an
executive summary to be placed in the Dean’s office for those who wish to view
it to do so would be two options.
3. It was
decided after some discussion that the committee should use four questions from
each section, and that it would be appropriate to move on to the academic
section. However, it was also decided to use question 11 in student life as it
was closely tied to question 8.
4. After
discussion it was decided that due to confusion question 8 would be re-coded
using the following codes:
1. As good as can be expected
2. An ideal but…
3. Doesn’t work
4. Works for academics
6. Other
5. Question
11 will be coded with the following codes:
1. Better reporting system
2. More education on the honor code
3. Publicize hearings/verdicts
4. Make honor code more visible
5. Stronger consequences
6. Increase community dialogue
7. Other
6. The four questions the
committee will use for the section on academics are as follows: #28, 30, 33, 36. Themes need to be generated for these questions.
7. The committee will meet next
Thursday 2/12 at
Meeting
adjourned at
Respectfully
Submitted,
Nicole
Pellegrino