| Hand in:
Moore,
Sec. 7.1 Matched pairs : you just treat the difference/change as one variable (x). By hand. p. 378 7.8 tomatoes. Give two values between which P lies, from Table C. p.386 7.21 healing in newts You
would
only need SPSS for part a, to check the mean and s.d.-- just look
at the answers in the back of the book for them. Finish a, do b,c
. (SPSS) p. 382, 7.11 caffeine dependence Again, watch out
for the
direction of your differences and what they mean. Postpone the rest: Read now for
context. |
What is the
significance
to Statistics of the Guinness Stout Bottle ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HW questions on t-procedures? SPSS?
Matched pairs, Robustness: Day
38
SPSS for Matched pairs: See
Handout from Monday, backside of one-sample t.
--You can use the built-in Analyze>Compare
Means>Paired-Samples T-Test.
Disadvantages: It always subtracts the rightmost
variable from the leftmost. You don't get a list of the
differences.
--Create a new variable of the Differences: Transform>Compute:
Target variable: Difference,
Numeric Expression: firstVariable - secondVariable.
Do One Sample on Difference.
Start here Friday
Sec. 7.2, Comparing two means"Two-sample
tests". Two SRS's, independent, from
distinct
populations. (Populations are normally distributed)
Often--comparing means from an experiment with two treatments (usually
control and "treatment"). Cf. p. 140.
/--- Group 1, n1---- Treatment 1---\
/
\
Random
asst.
Compare results
\
/
\--- Group 2, n2---- Treatment 2---/
To examine the difference of the two means, µ1
- µ2:
We need fairly normal populations; no extreme outliers.
Back to back stemplots are good; boxplots will do.
We use the difference of the two x-bars, diff =
xbar1 - xbar2
=
.
We need the Standard Error of the difference xbar1
- xbar2
,
and then we can proceed as before, more or less.
The Standard Error is calculated like the hypotenuse of a right
triangle
(Pythagorean Theorem), from the individual standard errors.
SEdiff = sqrt[SE(xbar1)2
+ SE(xbar2)2 ]
P. 394 has another way of writing the same thing:

Unfortunately, this doesn't quite have an exact t-distribution, and its exact distribution is very hard to deal with.
For doing by hand: df
= smaller of (n1- 1) and (n2- 1).
Will give a "conservative" result--slightly wider C.I., slightly less
significance, than a "sharper" value. If your
results
hinge on the difference between this result and the computer result,
they're
too close for comfort anyway.
From a computer: df = complicated formula on p. 403. Produces non-integer degrees of freedom. Very good approximation to the exact distribution, if both sample sizes are at least 5. Unsuitable for doing by hand.
Once we have (xbar1 - xbar2) , SEdiff
, and the df, our formulas pattern on the earlier
ones.
Example
CI : estimate + t* . SEestimate
CI for µ1 - µ2,
difference
of means, is
Test: H0: µ1 - µ2
= 0 same as µ1 = µ2 , "no
difference"
always
Ha: µ1
- µ2 > 0 same as µ1
> µ2
Be careful with these, that you know which direction you want.
or Ha: µ1
- µ2 < 0 same as µ1 <
µ2
Often
we label our variables "1" and "2" so that we expect µ1 >
µ2
or Ha: µ1
- µ2
0 same as µ1
µ2 (not equal)
Calculate t, find P-value
(approximate, conservative)
--SPSS will do our computations when we
are given raw data.
Back page of t- handout.
| Sievers home | Math151-Fall04/Dayf39.htm | 5:30pm | 12/1/04 |